MEAN stack vs MERN stack
Both MEAN stack and MERN stack are full stack frameworks with Java coded components. The differences are few but significant. For example, MEAN uses AngularJS, while MERN uses ReactJS developed by Facebook. However, both the development stacks help make reactive and intuitive UIs.
Here are a few striking differences between MEAN and MERN:
- The MEAN stack uses Mongo DB, Express, AngularJS and Node, while MERN uses Mongo DB, Express, ReactJS and Node.
- MEAN uses JavaScript development stack and MERN uses Open-source JavaScript library.
- MEAN uses Typescript library while MERN uses JavaScript and JSX.
- MEAN uses component-based architecture and regular DOM, MERN uses Virtual DOM.
- MEAN has a bidirectional data flow and MERN has unidirectional dataflow.
Both technologies have high class features and lots of functionality. Let’s also take a look at the benefits of both of these languages:
MEAN stack enables the development of all types of applications easily. It has various plugins and widgets available that are compatible with it. This availability of plug-ins helps developers create innovative functionality for apps. Real time testing is possible with the built-in tools. Single language is used for backend and frontend support this makes the application response faster.
MERN stack has front end and back end covered by a single coding script. The entire process is completed by using only Java and JSON. It used the MVC architecture. It runs on open source and has the flexibility to modify the code easily.
However, both MEAN and MERN are equally secure and scalable. For CRUD — MEAN is the ideal stack. ReactJS in MERN improves functionality through its supplementary libraries. Overall, MEAN is a better option for large scale applications and MERN is good for faster development of smaller applications.
In some areas of development MEAN scores higher and for some MERN. Essentially, application requirements will help decide which is the best option for your project!